Friday, September 30, 2011

Bushido

"Japan was ruled by warrior for the better part of a millennium. From the twelfth to the nineteenth century its political history was dominated by the struggle of competing leagues of fighting men. These centuries left a lasting imprint on the country's values and society. Bushi, "fighting men," and samurai, "those who serve," developed a rhetoric with emphases of loyalty and courage and worked out a code that came to be known as "Bushido," the Way of the Warrior."(1)
That was a quote from, Warrior rule in Japan, which when I read this I knew that I had finally found the book that I wanted to use to do my post. Bushido is a code that would not permit compromise or defeat, I apologize that your already covered this Tanner but I was assigned Japan so how can you not talk about the Samurai because they are such a central part of the Japanese history, this code of Bushido was based on honor. Honor to your name and family counted for more than your life if you lived by Bushido. If you failed you were left with only one honorable choice you were to perform, "seppuku".  I do not recommend looking up pictures of this word because what it means is to disembowel yourself. This shows the dedication of the Japanese soldiers to their government. 


The Japanese government for quite a while was controlled by an emperor. The "government in Japan was exercised by a hierarchy of ruling families whose authority, though secured originally by military force, was ultimately rationalized on the basis of lineage and exerted along the lines of kin relationship."(1)


The imperial government even went so far as to trace their lineage to the sun goddess so as to make it so that it would be hard for anyone to legitimize their claims to the government. This made it so that even though the warrior class held alot of power it took them a long time to realize that they had the ability to become the rulers of their own lands. Once they had done this they became the, "gokenin", or vassals who were entrusted with land and followers.


When the mongols attacked the Japan, (history channel video about the attack) the warrior were at this time not fighting against some force that had land that they could seize from the enemy so the battle was paid for by the, "gokenin," who did not like the fact that they were paying for a battle that didn't help them to make more money. The Japanese would have been defeated by the mongols if they wouldn't have been saved by, "divine wind", or Kamikaze which came up and destroyed the mongol ships and decimated their forces. 


After this time the fighting men realized that they had the power and they basically made it so that the position of emperor is like today's modern day England kings and queens because they perform ceremonies but they don't really have any power of the operations of the government. Once they realized this the samurai controlled the government for the next 4 or 5 centuries, while all the time showing that their code of Bushido, which required keeping honor intact continued to be the main staying belief of Japanese culture.


5 comments:

  1. One thing that has always been interesting to me is the deification of royalty. It's surprisingly common among ancient cultures, and it has served several purposes. One of which, as you mentioned, was to make it difficult for rebels or usurpers to attain power; who would be willing to fight against someone who was part god? By changing people's perceptions in this way, the leader also assured himself of the obedience of his subjects. Disobeying a king was one thing, but disobedience to a god could bring eternal consequences.

    I wonder how such things started? It seems like the sort of thing that could have just as easily begun in writing or in words; a king could have his genealogy traced on paper back to a god, or bards and poets could be hired to sing about his divine heritage, or maybe (probably) both.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow! How unfortunate for the Mongols! Their entire fleet was wiped out by a freak storm. haha. Still, it makes you wonder. Was the typhoon really as coincidental as the History channel narrator suggested? Who are we to say that no divine power intervened? Anyway.

    I like your comment Brett. Sounds a little like a conspiracy though. What do you think? Do you think that the rulers intentionally deceived their subjects into believing that they were chosen by God? Or did they believe it themselves? Or does it even matter what their intentions were?

    Perhaps they really were chosen by a divine power... sorry, the Mahabharata has really got me thinking. In it, some fantastic things happen that I can't believe really happened, but many believe the Mahabharata to be a literal history. How much of what we perceive as truth really is?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well guys I like the direction you went with my post and it is really interesting how we can look at lots of cultures and see that they claim to be gods or part gods. I think this may stem from the fact that there is a god in heaven and we all can have the opportunity to become like our heavenly father. Thus why some people might get confused if they had corrupt principles being taught to them. Thanks for the comments you two they are really interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  4. No problem Montana, it's easy to comment on an interesting post! =)

    Jake, you're right, it does sound a little conspiracy-ish, and I don't necessarily think that's what happened. But, if you'll let me be Devil's Advocate, stuff like that *does* happen; look at the king's position in the Anglican church, or at the propaganda from supporters of Kim Jong-il, or even the Nazis? On the one hand, it's hard to accuse somebody of falsifying something like that, even someone thousands of years old, but you have to think there was someone, somewhere, who knew it wasn't true when the belief was started.

    Then again, maybe they had really convinced themselves of it, too? And if they did, should that matter in our historical perspective on them, or not?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nice post Montana, no need to apologize haha.. I think you expanded on a lot of things I left out in my original post. anyways puttin my 2 cents in.. I would have to say that in most cases in history kings used the principle of divine kingship to gain more more power over their people rather than really being directed of God. In most cases, especially evident in the Book of Mormon, Heavenly father doesn't tend to put one person in absolute power because they can lead an entire people into wickedness.

    ReplyDelete